April 2006,  Vol. 9, No. 4
PEAK OF PERFORMANCE NEWS                        
 
General Manager Comments
 
We held another successful Alberta Pork Congress in March, where 155 companies filled up 300 booth spaces to exhibit their products and services. A good turnout of producers at the Congress provided a steady stream of clients to our booth to enter our prize draw. Congratulations to Tim Entz at Kings Lake Colony on winning the Skil electric drill.

Congratulations to the winners in the Reach for the Top competition sponsored by OLYMEL! Highest average index on qualified hogs was 113.5 while highest percentage of hogs meeting the 60-69 mm lean measurement was 50%. Athabasca Colony was overall winner because of placing in the top 5 in three of the categories, winning Food Safety award, where 98% of its hogs are clearly tattooed!

There were a number of people that visited our booth to say that they were building new barns as well as a couple that indicated their exit from the industry. Small herd size is still an issue for marketing hogs, where low numbers of hogs coming to market irregularly are not meeting criteria set by packers. As well, those smaller herds are not able to feed their feeder hogs specifically in nursery, grower, early-finishing and late-finishing stages so as to provide market hogs that are lean (17 mm backfat) and meaty (61 mm loins). It’s a real consideration for some producers, in not being able to meet contract requirements to achieve the best hog pricing.
 
PEAK Growth Summit
 
Growth in Productivity Improvement

Hutterville Colony continues its improvement in weaning pigs per litter in its 575 sow herd for the past year:

 

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Average total pigs per litter

12.8

12.9

13.2

13.2

Average live pigs per litter

12.3

12.5

12.6

12.7

Pigs weaned per sow

11.0

11.6

12.2

11.8

Pigs weaned/mated female/year

27.7

28.8

30.4

29.5

Pre-wean mortality, %

4.5

4.0

4.2

4.3

 
Peak Customers
 
It was a pleasure to visit with so many of our customers at the Alberta Pork Congress during March 15, 16. Most everyone had some reason to smile about success in their home herds, especially where it was a management change made for the better.

Thanks to everyone for continuing as valued PEAK clients!

 
PEAK Book Of World Records
 
Starbrite Colony continues its success in breeding purebred gilts in its in-house multiplier herd. Now the first four litters from purebred gilts are 12, 18, 14 and 12 live pigs, averaging 14 per litter. Other herds are finding similar results.

We still find it amazing that some managers are able to achieve a 0% warranty rate on replacement gilts and boars. Peaceview Colony was able to breed every one of its 155 purchased gilts in 2005; all came on heat, all bred, all had adequate physical soundness.
 
Breeding Herd Efficiency:  The Role of Sow Nutrition, Part 6
Dr. Frank Aherne, Pig Industry Consultant
 
Currently, most gestating sows are fed on the basis of condition score. It’s been shown that adoption of a feeding system based on an estimate of sow weight and backfat level at the time of breeding will:
  • lower feed cost per sow per year
  • result in less variation in sow condition at time of farrowing and a higher proportion of sows in the target backfat range of 17 to 21 mm.

Based on an estimate of sow weight and backfat level at time of breeding, a table of feeding allowances has been developed.

 Table 1. Feeding allowance for gestating sows (day 0-day 100)

   

Backfat at breeding, mm

A. Flank-to-flank measurement, cm Estimated sow weight, kg

<12

12.0-14.9

15.0-18.0

>18

   

Feed/day, kg

83 - 90

120 - 150

2.4

2.1

1.9

1.6

91 - 97

150 - 180

2.6

2.4

2.1

1.9

98 - 104

180 - 215

2.8

2.6

2.4

2.1

105 - 112

215 - 250

3.1

2.8

2.6

2.4

113 - 127

250 - 300

3.3

3.0

2.7

2.6

 

B. For those reluctant to use the cloth tape to take flank-to-flank measurements, the sows should be assigned to a weight class based on visual appraisal. For example:

Very light <150 kg

Light 150-180 kg

Medium 180-215 kg

Heavy 215-250 kg

Very heavy >250 kg

C. Also, for farms not using actual backfat measurements, they could substitute condition scores for the four backfat classes shown in the Table 1. Example: sows with condition scores 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, >4.

For this feeding program, the diet should have a nutrient content similar to that shown in Table 2.

Note also that the feeding period is from breeding date (day 0) to day 100 of gestation. It is recommended that first parity sows be fed no more than 2.2 kg per day for the first 2-3 days after mating. Older parity sows can be assigned to the feeding levels shown in Table 1 immediately after service.

Table 2. Nutrient allowances for gestating sows

Energy and Protein

Mcal ME/kg  

3.0

Total lysine

%

0.55

Digestible lysine

%

0.45

Crude protein

%

13.5

Fat

%

2.5

 Minerals

Calcium

%

0.90

Phosphorus

%

0.75

Ave. Phosphorus

%

0.40

Salt

%

0.40

Zinc

ppm

125

Iron

ppm

100

Manganese

ppm

30

Copper

ppm

20

Iodine

ppm

0.35

Selenium

ppm

0.30

 Vitamins

Vitamin A

IU/kg

8000

Vitamin D

IU/kg

800

Vitamin E

IU/kg

60

Vitamin K

mg/kg

4.4

Choline

mg/kg

660

Niacin

mg/kg

44

Riboflavin

mg/kg

10

D-pantothenate

mg/kg

30

Vitamin B12

mcg/kg

30

Folic acid

mcg/kg

1500

D-biotin

mcg/kg

330

 
Territory Managers
 
For more information, contact:
 
  Manager Territory Cell Telephone
Les Robinson Southern & Central Alberta (250) 833-6196
Paul Klingeman Pacific Northwest  (509) 989-1347
Mike Miller Saskatchewan and Montana (403) 317-0543
 
Recent Issues
 
2007 2006 2005 2004
January (Vol. 10, No.1) January (Vol. 9, No.1) January (Vol. 8, No.1) January (Vol. 7, No.1)
February

(Vol. 10, No.2)

February

(Vol. 9, No.2)

February

(Vol. 8, No.2)

February

(Vol. 7, No.2)

    March

(Vol. 9, No.3,
No.3a)

March

(Vol. 8, No.3,
No.3a)

March

(Vol. 7, No.3,
No.3a)

    April

(Vol. 9, No. 4)

April

(Vol. 8, No. 4)

April

(Vol. 7, No. 4)

    May

(Vol. 9, No. 5)

May

(Vol. 8, No. 5)

May

(Vol. 7, No. 5)

    June

(Vol. 9, No. 6)

June

(Vol. 8, No. 6)

June

(Vol. 7, No. 6)

    July (Vol. 9, No. 7) July

(Vol. 8, No. 7)

July

(Vol. 7, No. 7)

    August

(Vol. 9, No. 8)

August

(Vol. 8, No. 8)

August

(Vol. 7, No. 8)

    September

(Vol. 9, No. 9)

September

(Vol. 8, No. 9)

September

(Vol. 7, No. 9)

    October (Vol. 9, No. 10) October (Vol. 8, No. 10) October (Vol. 7, No. 10)
    November (Vol. 9, No. 11) November (Vol. 8, No. 11) November (Vol. 7, No. 11)
    December (Vol. 9, No. 12) December (Vol. 8, No. 12) December (Vol. 7, No. 12)
 
 

Site Design:  Summit Solutions Ltd.