| |
December
2005, Vol. 8, No. 12
PEAK OF PERFORMANCE NEWS
|
|
|
| |
| General
Manager Comments |
| |
The Directors and Staff at PEAK Swine Genetics
wish everyone a very Merry Christmas as well as a Happy New Year in 2006! We
count our blessings and give thanks for all good things we’ve achieved, and
received, over the past year. Reasonable hog prices and good crops were
welcomed again in 2005, following an excellent 2004.
We all wish you continued success in the coming year!
There has been great success in the In-house Multiplication program
implemented in a number of herds across the Pacific Northwest. It has been
deemed to be the best of the programs offered to commercial producers in
terms of purebred quality and cost-effectiveness. This program allows the
herd to breed their own Summit gilt replacements using either purebred
Yorkshire or Landrace females bred to the opposite boar breed. Benefits
include (a) a better relationship with your veterinarian through (b)
reducing the number of entries into the herd (c) selecting herd replacements
at a convenient time (d) selecting animals with those attributes the
producer believes most important – conformation, legs, underlines and (e)
allowing replacements to have the same health status as the sow herd they
grow up in.Our Leduc offices
will be closed December 26th and 27th and again on January 2nd for the
seasonal holidays. |
| |
| PEAK Growth
Summit |
| |
Growth in Performance Improvement
|
Breed |
No. |
Average
Backfat |
Loin
Depth |
Loin Area |
Est. Lean Yield |
|
Landrace gilts |
55 |
9.6 mm |
65.5 mm |
45.4 sq cm |
64.1% |
|
Landrace boars |
2 |
9.7 mm |
65.6 mm |
42.7 sq cm |
64.1% |
|
Yorkshire gilts |
11 |
9.5 mm |
67.7 mm |
46.5 sq cm |
64.2% |
|
Yorkshire boars |
2 |
10.1 mm |
64.6 mm |
42.0 sq cm |
63.8% |
Boars and gilts probed at Jakubec Farms in
September continue to show terrific improvement in loins size. Biggest loin
probed at 100 kg liveweight on Landrace was 69.8 mm and on Yorkshires was
71.6 mm. |
| |
|
Peak Customers |
| |
| Welcome to Dale Fankhanel on his purchase of a Landrace boar. Our
sincere thanks to every one of our customers in 2005! |
| |
| PEAK Book
Of World Records |
| |
|
Bench Colony received a
Stewardship Award for production and innovation at the Swine Symposium in SK
in November. Well done to all the staff there on their dedication to barn
management.
Big Sky Colony was awarded the highest score for naturally-produced hogs
delivered to Independent Meats. Their tested pigs yielded 76.75% and had a
marbling score of 3.3; both highly satisfactory!
Congratulations to River Road Colony for marketing the highest indexing hog
group to Maple Leaf Foods, Brandon over the first 5 months of 2005! Super
management, nutrition and genetics came together for this carcass quality
factor.
4-H Fair pigs in Montana and
Washington supplied from Big Sky Colony were class winners this fall. One of
the pigs in MT returned $700 from its sale, with Fair pigs in WA selling
between $2-$3/pound live.
Congratulations to all the class winners! |
| |
Breeding Herd Efficiency:
The role of sow nutrition, Part 4
Dr. Frank Aherne, Pig Industry Consultant |
| |
In the last article we showed that Canada
lags behind some European countries in several aspects of breeding herd
efficiency. Our sense of national pride may be hurt by our relatively poor
production levels, but our pride and profit levels are hurt a lot more by
our not being the best we can be on our own farms. As individual producers
we certainly have some capability and a very strong motivation to improve
the productivity of our own herds. We must:
- Feel a sense of urgency that improvement is required
- Have a clear vision of the improvements needed
- Have the knowledge, skill and enthusiasm to bring about the
necessary improvements
- Ensure widespread and clear communication between management and
barn staff and remove all obstacles to the changes required
- Demonstrate and acknowledge progress that’s made.
There is little doubt that Canada will face increased international
competition in the future and that labor and housing costs will increase,
simply through inflation. The new reality for North American hog production
is that future average hog prices will not be significantly above average
production costs. Added to this is the likelihood that environmental
concerns, welfare issues and regulatory controls will all add pressure to
improve production efficiency and reduce input costs. Most costs in the
breeding herd, including feed costs, are fixed costs. Increasing breeding
herd efficiency by improving the number of pigs weaned/sow/year and reducing
non-productive days will reduce overall production costs and thus increase
profitability. In general, we will probably have a more significant effect
on profitability by increasing output than we will by reducing input costs
but obviously effort must be made to do both.
To recap on some ideas discussed in the series of articles presented
previously in PEAK of Performance News! (Feb. 2002 to Jun. 2003):
- Ensure that the size of your sow herd is appropriate for the
facilities available.
- Always meet your breeding targets. This can be calculated as:
number of farrowing crates available/week X 1.05 X 52
number of litters/sow/year
- Keep non-productive days (NPD: days on which inventoried gilts or
sows are neither pregnant nor lactating) as low as possible. Each NPD
probably costs $2.50. The Canadian average is probably about 60 but
should be reduced to 45-50.
- The biggest contributors to NPD are:
- Entry to service interval [target: <40 days]
- Weaning to service interval [target: < 10 days]
The next most important contributors to increased NPD are the
intervals between (a) entry to ‘no-heat’; (b) weaning to ‘no-heat’; (c)
breeding to detected ‘not in pig’ and then intervals between (d)
deciding to cull and (e) actually getting rid of the animals.
Some other ideas discussed previously are:
- properly size the gilt pool. Do not allow gilts to contribute
excessive NPDs. Develop a good heat-induction system using vasectomized
boars of high libido. Breed gilts when you need them to meet breeding
targets. But it would be desirable to breed gilts when they are 130-135
kg, at their second estrus.
- do not wean any sows at less than 15 days of lactation. It is
important that all records tell not only average performance levels but
also the variation around the mean (measured as standard deviation or
coefficient of variation). Of course, we want the average performance
levels to meet our target levels over time but the actual variation
around the mean may be equally or more important. Example: if you target
to breed 50 animals a week except that you meet this target level over
two weeks by breeding 40 one week and 60 the next. Yes, the average is
50 but the consequent increased stress on staff and facilities incurred
by the week-to-week variation will be considerable. Some of this
variation is uncontrollable because of normal biological variation but a
lot of it is due to poor management. The bigger the variation in any
performance parameter from week to week the greater is the opportunity
for improvement. Concentrate on important parameters that have wide
monthly swings. Figure out he cause of these swings, then try to
minimize or eliminate it.
Management must take the major criticism for much of the poor
performance in breeding herd efficiency. It is important to concentrate
on production issues that should be most responsive to improved
management and that will result in worthwhile improvements in production
efficiency and/or profitability.
|
| |
| Territory
Managers |
| |
For more
information, contact:
| |
Manager |
Territory |
Cell
Telephone |
|
Les Robinson |
Southern &
Central Alberta |
(250) 833-6196 |
|
Paul Klingeman |
Pacific Northwest |
(509) 989-1347 |
|
Mike Miller |
Saskatchewan
and Montana |
(403) 317-0543 |
|
| |
| Recent
Issues |
| |
| 2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
2004 |
|
|
|
|
January |
(Vol. 10, No.1) |
January |
(Vol. 9, No.1) |
January |
(Vol. 8, No.1) |
January |
(Vol. 7, No.1) |
|
February
|
(Vol. 10, No.2) |
February
|
(Vol. 9, No.2) |
February |
(Vol. 8, No.2) |
February |
(Vol. 7, No.2) |
|
| |
|
March |
(Vol.
9, No.3,
No.3a) |
March |
(Vol.
8, No.3,
No.3a) |
March |
(Vol.
7, No.3,
No.3a) |
|
| |
|
April |
(Vol. 9, No. 4) |
April |
(Vol. 8, No. 4) |
April |
(Vol. 7, No. 4) |
|
| |
|
May |
(Vol. 9, No. 5) |
May |
(Vol. 8, No. 5) |
May |
(Vol. 7, No. 5) |
|
| |
|
June
|
(Vol. 9, No. 6)
|
June
|
(Vol. 8, No. 6)
|
June |
(Vol. 7, No. 6) |
|
| |
|
July
|
(Vol. 9, No. 7)
|
July
|
(Vol. 8, No. 7)
|
July |
(Vol. 7, No. 7) |
|
| |
|
August
|
(Vol. 9, No. 8)
|
August
|
(Vol. 8, No. 8)
|
August |
(Vol. 7, No. 8) |
|
| |
|
September
|
(Vol. 9, No. 9)
|
September
|
(Vol. 8, No. 9)
|
September |
(Vol. 7, No. 9) |
|
| |
|
October
|
(Vol. 9, No. 10)
|
October
|
(Vol. 8, No. 10)
|
October |
(Vol. 7, No. 10) |
|
| |
|
November
|
(Vol. 9, No. 11)
|
November |
(Vol. 8, No. 11)
|
November |
(Vol. 7, No. 11) |
|
| |
|
December |
(Vol. 9, No. 12) |
December |
(Vol. 8, No. 12) |
December |
(Vol. 7, No. 12) |
|
|
| |
| |
Site Design: Summit
Solutions Ltd. |