June 2005,  Vol. 8, No. 6
PEAK OF PERFORMANCE NEWS                        
 
General Manager Comments
 
The winds of change are blowing through the packing industry in North America. These changes may impact hog producers to a greater or lesser extent. Smithfield Foods has closed three plants for several days on the eastern seaboard, resulting in a lower price for hogs in the past weeks. The expansion of OLYMEL Red Deer’s kill by 11,000 hogs/week this Fall will require contracts with up to 50 new producers (each with a semi-load/week). The declining kill at World Wide Pork means delivery of these hogs to other kill facilities.
In the meantime, producers will be asked to provide hogs that meet every criterion for that slaughter plant’s needs. Genetics, nutrition and management will impact on the carcass quality and meat quality of delivered hogs. Assuring these appropriate management routines and techniques will be a new demand on barn managers.

More and more PEAK Swine Genetics herds are contracting with OLYMEL at Red Deer, especially on the heavier carcass grid. These herds are sending hogs that meet some general requirements and the farms will work toward meeting the more specific requirements for leanness and loin size. These herds are receiving replacement boars with large loins and low backfat to ensure the genetic component is being met.
 
PEAK Growth Summit
 
GROWTH in Performance Improvement

Trailblazer® and Pathfinder Duroc boars, along with Yorkshire and Landrace boars probed at Five Lakes Farms in March showed the excellent performance in the table below:

 Breed

No.

Average Backfat

Age to 100 kg live weight

Loin Depth

Est. Lean Yield

Trailblazer®

35

10.3mm

165 days

64.4 mm

63.5%

Pathfinder

6

10.9 mm

183 days

67.4 mm

63.4%

Landrace boars

2

8.9 mm

160 days

61.4 mm

64.2%

Yorkshire boars

10

10.5 mm

163 days

62.2 mm

63.4%

 
Peak Customers
 
Springpoint Colony is filling with Summit® gilts, along with Trailblazer® and Pathfinder Duroc boars.

Thank you all for joining us as PEAK clients!

 
PEAK Book Of World Records
 
Six Duroc gilts probed at Five Lakes Farms March 29 averaged 67.4 mm lean depth. These gilts should be terrific dams for the next crop of Pathfinder Duroc boars that we are currently breeding.

When Bench Colony weaned its weekly allotment of 10 litters in the week of April 11, there were 11.7 piglets weaned in each. Large litter size born live from good genetics and excellent management results in big litters weaned.

37 doses of extended semen is the average production per collection for both a Trailblazer® boar and a Landrace boar in the month of April. These boars are currently standing at stud at Magnum Swine Genetics.
 
 
Breeding Herd Efficiency:  The Role of Sow Nutrition (Part 1)
Dr. Frank Aherne, Pig Industry Consultant
 
Because of the ongoing changes in agricultural policy and liberalization in trade, world trade in pork has increased significantly. Over the period 1998 to 2004, Canadian exports increased by 126%. Canada now exports about 50% of its total pork production, 70% of which goes to the USA. To remain competitive in this global industry will require:
  • Low cost of production (not a guarantee for herd survival)
  • Quality and safety of pork products
  • Efficient hog production

Competitiveness in the primary production area will obviously play an important part in determining success in the export market. A recent survey by the Danish Bacon and Meat Council (2002) showed that Canada has relatively low cost of production but is less competitive in sow reproductive efficiency. As can be seen in Figure 1, Canada has the lowest cost of production per kg carcass of all the countries in the survey. The competitive advantage comes from lower feed costs, low hourly wages, low building costs, low interest rates, economy of unit size and adoption of new technologies.

Figure 1. Production costs per kg carcass, 2002 (Danish Kroner comparison)

Figure 2. Number of liveborn piglets, 2002

Figure 3. Overall mortality, % 2002

However, Canada has significantly lower live born litter size and higher pig mortality (Figures 2, 3). The result is that Canada markets fewer pigs per sow per year than many of the European countries: 19.5 vs 22.0 in Denmark. One area of reproductive efficiency in which Canada badly lags behind the European countries is number of pigs weaned per sow per lifetime. France can achieve 60 to 65 pigs weaned per sow lifetime compared to 35 to 40 in Canada (PigChamp data). The question then becomes why is reproductive efficiency lower in Canada than in some European countries? We have access to the same genetics and technologies. The author of the Danish survey suggests that low genetic merit of the sows in some herds is a contributing factor. This lower genetic merit is due to use of slaughter animals as breeding stock and poor gilt pool management. Other possible contributing factors might be:

- Disease levels and stocking density in some hog producing areas could make the prevalence of diseases such as PRRS more problematic in Canada.

- Earlier weaning age (20.6 days in Canada, and 21 or more days in Europe).

- Larger unit size, fewer "family farms".

- Low unemployment levels. Low employee wages and availability of alternative employment reduces the availability of a skilled, knowledgeable and motivated labor force.

- Reduced profit margins in recent years may also have led to higher stocking densities and reduced labor input per animal, which may also have resulted in poorer sow performance.

- It is also possible that our low production costs in Canada reduces our competitive edge and leads to complacency and inefficiency.

Our next article will discuss the role of sow nutrition in breeding herd efficiency.

 
Territory Managers
 
For more information, contact:
 
  Manager Territory Cell Telephone
Les Robinson Southern & Central Alberta (250) 833-6196
Paul Klingeman Pacific Northwest  (509) 989-1347
Mike Miller Saskatchewan and Montana (403) 317-0543
 
Recent Issues
 
2007 2006 2005 2004
January (Vol. 10, No.1) January (Vol. 9, No.1) January (Vol. 8, No.1) January (Vol. 7, No.1)
February

(Vol. 10, No.2)

February

(Vol. 9, No.2)

February

(Vol. 8, No.2)

February

(Vol. 7, No.2)

    March

(Vol. 9, No.3,
No.3a)

March

(Vol. 8, No.3,
No.3a)

March

(Vol. 7, No.3,
No.3a)

    April

(Vol. 9, No. 4)

April

(Vol. 8, No. 4)

April

(Vol. 7, No. 4)

    May

(Vol. 9, No. 5)

May

(Vol. 8, No. 5)

May

(Vol. 7, No. 5)

    June

(Vol. 9, No. 6)

June

(Vol. 8, No. 6)

June

(Vol. 7, No. 6)

    July (Vol. 9, No. 7) July

(Vol. 8, No. 7)

July

(Vol. 7, No. 7)

    August

(Vol. 9, No. 8)

August

(Vol. 8, No. 8)

August

(Vol. 7, No. 8)

    September

(Vol. 9, No. 9)

September

(Vol. 8, No. 9)

September

(Vol. 7, No. 9)

    October (Vol. 9, No. 10) October (Vol. 8, No. 10) October (Vol. 7, No. 10)
    November (Vol. 9, No. 11) November (Vol. 8, No. 11) November (Vol. 7, No. 11)
    December (Vol. 9, No. 12) December (Vol. 8, No. 12) December (Vol. 7, No. 12)
 
 

Site Design:  Summit Solutions Ltd.