September 2009 ,  Vol. 12, No. 9
PEAK OF PERFORMANCE NEWS                        
 
General Manager Comments
 
The summer doldrums have replaced any excitement for increasing hog prices. Unless there is less pork coming to slaughter, we are unlikely to see an upward move to hog prices to the end of the year. Downturns in production levels by Smithfield Foods, Tyson Foods in the US and Big Sky Farms in Canada are significant. There may well be decisions made by other American and Canadian producers to reduce their breeding herds and thereby their pig production. I hope sooner than later! With news of the North American economy on the upswing, there may be an increasing demand for pork. With less news of the incidence of “swine flu”, we may see a return to eating pork as the best meat alternative.

The attitude of our customers remains positive. It’s a nice thing to hear that these farms are making good use of forwarding contracting in both hogs and feed supplements.

 
PEAK Growth Summit

GROWTH in New Challenges:

We’re very happy with the performance of the new Challenger sire line developed through our Lacombe/Duroc/ Pietrain breeding program. We expect these boars to have superior loin sizes, both depth and area, while maintaining a low level of backfat. These boars have the physical soundness and body conformation for selection so that all boars have found new homes in commercial herds.

Boar

Loin depth, mm

Loin area, sq cm

Backfat thickness, mm

Lean yield, %

Age to 100 kg, days

8AE 251W

72.0

46.2

9.0

64.6

145

8AE 252W

72.0

45.7

10.3

64.0

144

8AE 253W

73.0

46.6

9.1

64.5

147

8AE 254W

66.9

43.6

9.2

64.4

150

8AE 255W

65.1

42.8

9.2

64.3

153

 
Peak Customers
 

We’re very pleased that Livingstone Colony is now also taking Challenger boars, joining Red Willow and Wild Rose Colonies as well as Kingdom Farms. Challenger boars will be coming through the system on a regular basis from both Five Lakes Farms and Bloomsbury Farms.
We welcome Miami Colony as a customer for our Summit gilts.
Thank you to all our customers for your continued, and expanded, replacement purchases.

 
PEAK BookOf World Records
 
Bench Colony reports performance in January through April 2009 for 13.2 pigs total born/litter resulting in 12.4 pigs born live, with 10.8 pig weaned/litter. The herd is producing 27 pigs weaned/ sow/year. Replacement rate in the herd is reduced to a mere 43.3%.

Finishing Herd Efficiency, Part 9, Factors Affecting Feed Intake: Dietary Factors
(Reprinted from V7,No10 PEAK of Performance News! by the late Dr. Frank Aherne. This is the ninth of twelve articles in this series.)

Energy density of the diet

With modern lean-type pigs, one of the biggest limiting factors in pig growth under practical conditions is reduced energy intake, especially for pigs up to 65 kg. As the energy density of the diet increases, there is an increase in protein growth up to the level of the genetic potential of the pigs. With good genotypes, this may occur at about 85 kg. After this weight, daily lean growth remains the same up to slaughter weight (113 kg). However, the response in fat growth to increased dietary energy level remains linear.

Although an increase in the energy level of the diet usually results in a decrease in feed intake, energy intake usually increases. The formulation or nutrient specifications of your diets should be farm- specific, that is, the diets should be formulated on the basis of knowledge of the lean tissue growth rate and feed intake of the pigs on your farm. Without such knowledge, estimates of nutrient requirements must be made. An example of such estimated requirements is shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Nutrition allowance for growing-finishing pigs

Weight, kg 20-40 40-60 60-80 80-100 100-115

Feed intake/day, kg

1.3

1.85

2.40

2.90

3.30

Gain/day, kg

0.70

0.85

0.92

1.00

0.95

DE, Mcal/kg

3.47

3.45

3.25

3.25

3.25

% Protein

21

19

17

15

14

% Lysine

1.30

1.15

1.00

0.85

0.70

% Calcium

0.8

0.70

0.65

0.60

0.60

% Phosphorus

0.60

0.55

0.55

0.50

0.50

Table 2. Ideal pattern of amino acids as a percent of the lysine level

Amino Acid

Digestible amino acid basis

Pig weight, kg 20-50 50-75 75-120

Lysine

100

100

100

Threonine

61

63

63

Tryptophan

17

18

18

Methione + Cystine

57

58

59

These suggested nutrient allowances should be appropriate for pigs of above-average growth rate. Although they won’t promote excessive fatness, they should allow carcass backfat levels between 18-24 mm, which should facilitate easy removal of skin from the carcass by pulling in skinning slaughter plants.

For hogs sold to packers that do not skin the carcass (scalding plants), the dietary energy level could be reduced to 3.15 Mcal DE/kg in the growth period 80 to 115 kg.

Because pigs can adjust their feed intake according to the energy content of the diet, it is essential that the amino acid lysine be fed in a specific ratio to the energy in the diet, at least up to the late finishing stage. A suggested lysine to energy ratio for pigs with good lean growth rate might be:

Pig weight, kg Grams digestible lysine/Mcal DE

20-40

2.4

40-80

2.1

80-100

1.8

100-120

1.6

There are other dietary essential amino acids that must be included in the diet if the pig is to grow well. These essential amino acids are included in the diet in a specific ratio to lysine, reflecting the approximate ratios that they occur in pig muscles. An example of such a ratio is shown in Table 2. This ratio of amino acids is called an ideal ratio. Only those amino acids likely to be limiting in Western Canada are included in the table.

The final step

By careful selection of feedstuffs on the basis of cost and quality, diets can be formulated to meet the pig’s nutrient requirements and thereby promote optimum and cost effective lean tissue growth.

 
Territory Managers
 
For more information, contact:
 
  Manager Territory Cell Telephone
Les Robinson Southern & Central Alberta (250) 833-6196
Paul Klingeman Pacific Northwest  (509) 989-1347
Art Goelema Northern Alberta & Saskatchewan (403) 963-0171
 
Recent Issues
 
2009 2008 2007 2006 2005
January (Vol. 12, No.1) January (Vol. 11, No.1) January (Vol. 10, No.1) January (Vol. 9, No.1) January (Vol. 8, No.1)
February

(Vol. 12, No.2)

February

(Vol. 11, No.2)

February

(Vol. 10, No.2)

February

(Vol. 9, No.2)

February

(Vol. 8, No.2)

March

(Vol.12, No.3,
No.3a)

March

(Vol.11, No.3,
No.3a)

March

(Vol. 10, No.3,
No.3a)

March

(Vol. 9, No.3,
No.3a)

March

(Vol. 8, No.3,
No.3a)

April

(Vol. 12, No. 4)

April

(Vol. 11, No. 4)

April

(Vol. 10, No. 4)

April

(Vol. 9, No. 4)

April

(Vol. 8, No. 4)

May

(Vol. 12, No. 5)

May

(Vol. 11, No. 5)

May

(Vol. 10, No. 5)

May

(Vol. 9, No. 5)

May

(Vol. 8, No. 5)

June

(Vol. 12, No. 6)

June

(Vol. 11, No. 6)

June

(Vol. 10, No. 6)

June

(Vol. 9, No. 6)

June

(Vol. 8, No. 6)

July

(Vol. 12, No. 7)

July

(Vol. 11, No. 7)

July

(Vol. 10, No. 7)

July (Vol. 9, No. 7) July

(Vol. 8, No. 7)

August

(Vol. 12, No. 8)

August

(Vol. 11, No. 8)

August

(Vol. 10, No. 8)

August

(Vol. 9, No. 8)

August

(Vol. 8, No. 8)

September

(Vol. 12, No. 9)

September

(Vol. 11, No. 9)

September

(Vol. 10, No. 9)

September

(Vol. 9, No. 9)

September

(Vol. 8, No. 9)

October

(Vol. 11, No. 10)

October

(Vol. 10, No. 10)

October (Vol. 9, No. 10) October (Vol. 8, No. 10)
November

(Vol. 11, No. 11)

November

(Vol. 10, No. 11)

November (Vol. 9, No. 11) November (Vol. 8, No. 11)
December

(Vol. 11, No. 12)

December

(Vol. 10, No. 12)

December (Vol. 9, No. 12) December (Vol. 8, No. 12)
 
 

Site Design:  Summit Solutions Ltd.