May 2009 ,  Vol. 12, No. 5
PEAK OF PERFORMANCE NEWS                        
 
General Manager Comments
 
Congratulations to Jim Smith, winner of the Alberta Pork Congress Lifetime Achievement Award, Ciaran Ormond, Pork Industry Leader and to Bluesky Colony’s Farm Team. Willow Creek Colony was named Champion of OLYMEL’s Reach for the Top competition. Well done by each of these winners!

It was a treat for me to tour Mr. Hans Faber through Alberta’s swine industry in March (also to practice my German). Mr. Faber is a Breeding Leader for the Multiplier System of the Baden-Wuerttemberg Swine Breeders Association (B-WSBA), an organization that operates in that Province. This Association is a composite of a number of similar separate organizations we maintain across Canada. The B-WSBA maintains herd books for purebred Pietrain, Yorkshire, Landrace and Lecoma breeds as well as assuring the performance of these pigs; operating three AI studs with 500 boars total; provides research facilities for measuring productivity, performance, carcass and meat quality for these breeds. It imported Duroc boars from two Canadian herds to develop a new market in Switzerland for the improvement of meat quality (color, marbling) that is necessary in that country, as compared to the absolute demand for Pietrain-sired hogs for southern Germany. It was terrific for Mr. Faber to attend Alberta Pork Congress so as to meet our Western breeders and producers.

 
PEAK Growth Summit

GROWTH in Performance Improvement:

February probing at Bloomsbury Farms showed great performance averages at 100 kg. Large loins for Landrace gilts measured 68.5 mm; Yorkshire gilts 65.5 mm; Duroc gilts 66.6 mm; Trailblazer boars 65.9 mm and Yorkshire boars 64.9 mm.

Breed

No.

Average Backfat

Loin Depth

Loin Area

Est. Lean Yield

Duroc gilts

12

10.3 mm

64.4 mm

44.6 sq cm

63.9%

Landrace gilts

47

9.3 mm

63.5

44.6 sq cm

64.3%

Yorkshire gilts

16

10.2 mm

64.2 mm

44.6 sq cm

63.9%

Trailblazer boars

21

10.2 mm

63.6

41.6 sq cmm

63.9%

 
Peak Customers
 

Welcome to Kingsland Colony on its fill with Summit gilts and Landrace gilts/Yorkshire boars for its in-house multiplication program.
We thank all our valued ongoing customers for continued purchases.

 
PEAK BookOf World Records
 
Neu Muehl Colony shows 17.5 mm backfat, 60.4 mm lean depth and 111.4 indexes on more than 1000 hogs delivered to OLYMEL in the six weeks of February and March. Hogs averaged 93.2 kg dressed.

OLYMEL results on settlement slips for Wild Rose Colony in February show good carcass qualities. A second load averaged 111.0 index on 65 hogs with 17.0 mm backfat.

Trait

Value

Duroc gilts

107

Carcass weight, kg

90.4

Backfat average, mm

15.2

Average index

110.4

Loin depth, mm

58.1

Health bonus, $

0.71

Lean 60-66 mm, %

30

Finishing Herd Efficiency, Part 5 Nutrition for Grow-Finish Pigs
(Reprinted from V7,No2 PEAK of Performance News! by the late Dr. Frank Aherne. This is the fifth of eleven articles in this series.)

The object of the grow-finish feeding program is to optimize pig growth rate, at an acceptable cost. The biggest factor affecting growth rate in most cases is feed intake. So, if you want fast growth in the grow-finish barn, you must encourage feed intake. In both the grower and finisher phases, about one-third of the feed eaten goes to maintain the animal (blood circulation, respiration, digestion, maintain body temperature, etc.) The rest of the food goes to support growth.

Table 1. Proportion of feed intake for maintenance

Body weight range 20-60 kg 60-115 kg
Average feed intake/day 1.58 kg 2.87 kg
Feed for maintenance (M)
percentage of total
34% 33%

To minimize maintenance requirements for feed, it is best to (a) encourage rapid growth, (b) lower the disease challenge and (c) house the pigs in a warm, comfortable environment to reduce body heat loss. Therefore, maximizing feed intake to encourage rapid growth is generally the most efficient and profitable way to raise grow-finish pigs, especially with modern, lean-type genotypes.

Feed intake

To maximize the feed intake of grow-finish pigs, it is not as simple as filling a feeder with feed and allowing the pigs to eat as much as they want. There are many factors that affect feed intake. These must be understood and managed if feed intake of grow-finish pigs is to be maximized. A list of factors affecting feed intake is shown below:

GenotypeSex of hogs
Health Status Acute disease
Chronic disease
Management Age and weight of pigs at entry and exit
Moving/mixing pigs
Stocking density (space allowance/pig)
Number of pigs/pen
Environment Barn temperature
Fluctuations in barn temperature
Humidity
Drafts on the pigs
Production Systems All in/all out by room or barn
Fill-time length
Number of sources of pigs in the barn
Water Quality of water
Flow rates in drinkers
Ease of access to water
Type of drinkers
Feeding Systems Wet-dry feeders
Dry feed/feeders
Pellets vs mash
Number of pigs per
feeder space
Ease of access
Feeder management
Split-sex feeding
Dietary Factors Formulation of diet
Quality of ingredients
Presence of mold
Presence of mycotoxins
Quality of the diet:
- digestibility
- nutrient balance
- fineness of grind
Use of feed additives
Feed budgeting

As can be seen in Figure 1, there are many factors that can affect feed intake. Most of them are under control of management.

An understanding of these factors can help producers to more clearly achieve the genetic potential in average daily feed intake of your pigs.

In the next series of articles, we will deal with some of the more important of these factors.

 
Territory Managers
 
For more information, contact:
 
  Manager Territory Cell Telephone
Les Robinson Southern & Central Alberta (250) 833-6196
Paul Klingeman Pacific Northwest  (509) 989-1347
Art Goelema Northern Alberta & Saskatchewan (403) 963-0171
 
Recent Issues
 
2009 2008 2007 2006 2005
January (Vol. 12, No.1) January (Vol. 11, No.1) January (Vol. 10, No.1) January (Vol. 9, No.1) January (Vol. 8, No.1)
February

(Vol. 12, No.2)

February

(Vol. 11, No.2)

February

(Vol. 10, No.2)

February

(Vol. 9, No.2)

February

(Vol. 8, No.2)

March

(Vol.12, No.3)

March

(Vol.11, No.3,
No.3a)

March

(Vol. 10, No.3,
No.3a)

March

(Vol. 9, No.3,
No.3a)

March

(Vol. 8, No.3,
No.3a)

April

(Vol. 12, No. 4)

April

(Vol. 11, No. 4)

April

(Vol. 10, No. 4)

April

(Vol. 9, No. 4)

April

(Vol. 8, No. 4)

May

(Vol. 12, No. 5)

May

(Vol. 11, No. 5)

May

(Vol. 10, No. 5)

May

(Vol. 9, No. 5)

May

(Vol. 8, No. 5)

June

(Vol. 11, No. 6)

June

(Vol. 10, No. 6)

June

(Vol. 9, No. 6)

June

(Vol. 8, No. 6)

July

(Vol. 11, No. 7)

July

(Vol. 10, No. 7)

July (Vol. 9, No. 7) July

(Vol. 8, No. 7)

August

(Vol. 11, No. 8)

August

(Vol. 10, No. 8)

August

(Vol. 9, No. 8)

August

(Vol. 8, No. 8)

September

(Vol. 11, No. 9)

September

(Vol. 10, No. 9)

September

(Vol. 9, No. 9)

September

(Vol. 8, No. 9)

October

(Vol. 11, No. 10)

October

(Vol. 10, No. 10)

October (Vol. 9, No. 10) October (Vol. 8, No. 10)
November

(Vol. 11, No. 11)

November

(Vol. 10, No. 11)

November (Vol. 9, No. 11) November (Vol. 8, No. 11)
December

(Vol. 11, No. 12)

December

(Vol. 10, No. 12)

December (Vol. 9, No. 12) December (Vol. 8, No. 12)
 
 

Site Design:  Summit Solutions Ltd.