June 2008 ,  Vol. 11, No. 6
PEAK OF PERFORMANCE NEWS                        
 
General Manager Comments
 
Returning from trips to China and Colombia recently, I found that the price of hogs is quite high at the moment – after severe losses of pigs and pig producers in those countries. Prices in China are now 17 RMB/kg live to give the equivalent return of Cdn$240 per pig, while the price of hogs in Colombia is about 3500 Colombian Pesos/kg live or about Cdn$200 per 100 kg pig. Feed prices are equivalent to ours, although some of the other input costs (labour, fuel, heating/cooling needs) are substantially lower than are ours. There is little likelihood that the small-scale producers will return to the industry in those countries – they will have found other cash-paying jobs. Demand for processing pork in these, and other, countries is also high as fewer hogs are coming to the local market now.

I understand that the Federal sow elimination program is being taken up quite well by producers exiting the pork industry. Barns and herds that go out of pigs now will need to stay out for the next three years. It’s unfortunate that the program wasn’t implemented a year sooner, so that producers might have been prepared to return to the industry for the better pricing and profitability anticipated in 2009, 2010 and 2011.

 
PEAK Growth Summit

GROWTH in Carcass Improvement:

Boars and gilts probed at Five Lakes Farms in May showed excellent performance averages at 100 kg. Biggest loin for Landrace gilts was 68.7 mm; Duroc gilts 68.7.0 mm; Yorkshire gilts 67.6 mm.

Breed

No.

Average Backfat

Loin Depth

Loin Area

Est. Lean Yield

Landrace gilts

9

9.3 mm

63.7 mm

44.7 sq cm

64.3%

Duroc gilts

5

9.8 mm

64.8 mm

45.1 sq cm

64.1%

Yorkshire gilts

29

10.0 mm

62.9 mm

44.0 sq cm

64.0%

Trailblazer boars

4

8.3 mm

63.2 mm

42.2 sq cmm

64.7%

 
Peak Customers
 

Welcome to Cayley Colony for buying Landrace boars to contribute to its dam line gilt breeding; and to Sunnybend Colony on its Yorkshire boar purchase. Thank you to all of our clients for your replacement boar and gilt purchases!

 
PEAK BookOf World Records
 
We continue our excitement over this being the 50th Anniversary of the distribution of the Lacombe breed in Canada.


High performance Lacombe boar

Lacombe boars averaged 128 Sire Line Index and 123 Dam Line Index on eight pigs probed May 2. Highest indexing gilt showed 177 SLI and 177 DLI. If we agree that hogs can reach market weight in 165 days, then Cayley Colony’s 25 market hogs (identified by notch) that went to slaughter at 260 pounds in 150 days is a great reflection on the high performance Yorkshire boars supplied by our F&S Hog Farm.

Breeding Herd Efficiency, Part 4
( Reprinted from V5,No8 PEAK of Performance News! by the late Dr. Frank Aherne. This series will continue for nine episodes)

Non-productive Days as an Indicator of Breeding Herd Efficiency

Non-productive days (NPD) are days in which inventoried females are neither pregnant nor lactating. This includes any gilts that have been selected and are over normal market weight. NPD can be calculated as follows:

NPD = 365 – [L/F/Y x (LL + GL)]
where L/F/Y is litters per mated female per year
LL is lactation length in days
GL is gestation length in days

For a modern herd, an example might be: 2.4 litters/sow/year, with a 16 day lactation and 115 days in gestation.

NPD = 365 – [2.4 x (16 + 115)] = 51 days

For this herd, 14% of the sows are inactive (51/365) at any one time.

The components of NPD and their relative importance are show in the following table:

Component Target, days %Contribution to NPD
Gilts
Entry-to-first-service
<30
20 
Entry-to-removal
<4
2
First service to conception
<3
First service to removal
<7
5
     
Sows
 Weaning-to-service
 <10
  25
Weaning-to-removal
<3
8
 First service to conception
 <5
  18
First service to removal
<7
19
From Dr. G. Dial 1994

Importance of parity distribution to pigs/sow/year

Parity 1 2 3 4 5 6+
No. born live 10.1 11.0 11.9 11.9 12.2 11.8
Farrowing rate % 88.6 90.6 91.9 91.2 92.1 82.6
No. born/bred sow 8.95 9.97 10.94 10.84 11.20 9.75
Herd data, 1250 sow herd

Targeted parity distribution

Parity 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
% of sows 20 18 17 16 14 10 5
% of sows parity 3, 4, 5 = 47%
% of sows parity 3 – 6 = 57%

As can be seen from the component table, the important contributors to NPD are entry-to-service interval, weaning-to-service interval and post-service intervals.

These post-service intervals are the time from service until she is detected as not being pregnant. Basically, NPD is a function of how long you keep gilts in the herd before you breed them; how good your farrowing rate is; how good your pregnancy detection system is; and how quickly you dispose of sows that are to be culled.

Increasing herd productivity: the role of the gilt

There are more gilts bred and farrowed than any other parity, and therefore, if entry to service periods are too long, gilts can contribute more than 30% of NPD within a herd. Also, if gilt litter size and farrowing rate are low, total herd productivity will be reduced.
Average replacement rates in Canada are about 48%, ranging from 28%-69%. The average number of litters per sow for these herds is 2.25, with the top 10% of herds farrowing 2.40 litters and the bottom 10% farrowing 2.10 litters/year. Gilt litters are 21% on average, ranging between 12% and 33%, using those average litter numbers

In the next article, we will discuss further the role of the gilt in breeding herd efficiency.

 
Territory Managers
 
For more information, contact:
 
  Manager Territory Cell Telephone
Les Robinson Southern & Central Alberta (250) 833-6196
Paul Klingeman Pacific Northwest  (509) 989-1347
Art Goelema Northern Alberta & Saskatchewan (403) 963-0171
 
Recent Issues
 
2009 2008 2007 2006 2005
January (Vol. 12, No.1) January (Vol. 11, No.1) January (Vol. 10, No.1) January (Vol. 9, No.1) January (Vol. 8, No.1)
February

(Vol. 12, No.2)

February

(Vol. 11, No.2)

February

(Vol. 10, No.2)

February

(Vol. 9, No.2)

February

(Vol. 8, No.2)

March

(Vol.11, No.3)

March

(Vol.11, No.3,
No.3a)

March

(Vol. 10, No.3,
No.3a)

March

(Vol. 9, No.3,
No.3a)

March

(Vol. 8, No.3,
No.3a)

April

(Vol. 11, No. 4)

April

(Vol. 10, No. 4)

April

(Vol. 9, No. 4)

April

(Vol. 8, No. 4)

May

(Vol. 11, No. 5)

May

(Vol. 10, No. 5)

May

(Vol. 9, No. 5)

May

(Vol. 8, No. 5)

June

(Vol. 11, No. 6)

June

(Vol. 10, No. 6)

June

(Vol. 9, No. 6)

June

(Vol. 8, No. 6)

July

(Vol. 10, No. 7)

July (Vol. 9, No. 7) July

(Vol. 8, No. 7)

August

(Vol. 10, No. 8)

August

(Vol. 9, No. 8)

August

(Vol. 8, No. 8)

September

(Vol. 10, No. 9)

September

(Vol. 9, No. 9)

September

(Vol. 8, No. 9)

October

(Vol. 10, No. 10)

October (Vol. 9, No. 10) October (Vol. 8, No. 10)
November

(Vol. 10, No. 11)

November (Vol. 9, No. 11) November (Vol. 8, No. 11)
December

(Vol. 10, No. 12)

December (Vol. 9, No. 12) December (Vol. 8, No. 12)
 
 

Site Design:  Summit Solutions Ltd.